Tail, a possible caracteristick?

[Suhio]

I thought that it would be kewl if they made tail a sort of characteristick that some saiyans could have and that they could link it to possible Giant Monkey cards. Thoughts?

[Wolf]

I thought that it would be kewl if they made tail a sort of characteristick that some saiyans could have and that they could link it to possible Giant Monkey cards. Thoughts?

yeah I suppose...

[WANDERINGJD]

i think it's more likely that those cards will just require saiyan to play.

[Suhio]

i think it's more likely that those cards will just require saiyan to play.

I was thinking about that but I doubt it. I think only Vegeta (when he just landed on Earth), Kid Goku, Kid Gohan and other Saiyans with tails will be able to. Not the SSJ Goku or Vegeta.

[CaMeRoN]

I was thinking about that but I doubt it. I think only Vegeta (when he just landed on Earth), Kid Goku, Kid Gohan and other Saiyans with tails will be able to. Not the SSJ Goku or Vegeta.

Arn't all Saiyans born with a tail? Doesn't the tail grow back after time? If the answer to both of those questions is yes then all Saiyans should be able to go ape at a time.

[soviet prince]

Arn't all Saiyans born with a tail? Doesn't the tail grow back after time? If the answer to both of those questions is yes then all Saiyans should be able to go ape at a time.

QFE

filler.......

[Wolf]

Props on spelling characteristics wrong Suhio (you spell checked me before on playtcg, me being Pain)

back to topic, I think the tail characteristic is a good idea

[Suhio]

Arn't all Saiyans born with a tail? Doesn't the tail grow back after time? If the answer to both of those questions is yes then all Saiyans should be able to go ape at a time.

Ya, they do grow back, but on a regular Goku card at a time when he doesnt have his tail, I dont think he would be able to go Monkey.

Props on spelling characteristics wrong Suhio (you spell checked me before on playtcg, me being Pain)

back to topic, I think the tail characteristic is a good idea

I have never spell checked you -____________- Ever.

[Goldenwill]

I actually really like the idea of an ability that only some saiyan character cards have that allow them to transform into apes. Because in all fairness some lose the ability during the course of the show due to the loss of there tail, not to mention Trunks never had a tail, yet Gohan did.. wth? lol

[Super_Saiya-jin_Vegeta]

I actually really like the idea of an ability that only some saiyan character cards have that allow them to transform into apes. Because in all fairness some lose the ability during the course of the show due to the loss of there tail, not to mention Trunks never had a tail, yet Gohan did.. wth? lol

I think Gohan having a tail when he was younger, and Trunks not having one at all, had to do with something about what genetic structure was more dominant in their DNA. Then again, that's just an uneducated assumption on why Trunks was tail-less and Gohan wasn't.
Also, don't forget that Goten didn't have a tail either.

[Wolf]

Ya, they do grow back, but on a regular Goku card at a time when he doesnt have his tail, I dont think he would be able to go Monkey.



I have never spell checked you -____________- Ever.

You sure? Maybe it was Vizard.....

I agree again

[Suhio]

I think Gohan having a tail when he was younger, and Trunks not having one at all, had to do with something about what genetic structure was more dominant in their DNA. Then again, that's just an uneducated assumption on why Trunks was tail-less and Gohan wasn't.
Also, don't forget that Goten didn't have a tail either.

In the Manga, Bulma tells Krillin that they cut off Baby Trunks' tail to prevent any Giant Ape problems. I assume it was the same reason for Goten?

You sure? Maybe it was Vizard.....

I agree again

I can guarantee 100% it wasnt me -____-
Vizard is a pretty good speller.... probaly him (you didnt hear it from me))))

[CaMeRoN]

In the Manga, Bulma tells Krillin that they cut off Baby Trunks' tail to prevent any Giant Ape problems. I assume it was the same reason for Goten?

For sure they cut off the tails of trunks and goten. Sometime throughout the series I remember the Z Fighters discussing Goku's tail. They had said that Goku had his tail surgically removed in order to prevent it from growing back. I remember them talking about this when they were getting Gohan's tail removed when he was a baby.

[Suhio]

For sure they cut off the tails of trunks and goten. Sometime throughout the series I remember the Z Fighters discussing Goku's tail. They had said that Goku had his tail surgically removed in order to prevent it from growing back. I remember them talking about this when they were getting Gohan's tail removed when he was a baby.

Goku never got his tail sugecaly removed, or else it wouldnt have been possible for it to grow back (threw that pincer thingy) in GT, Kami just cut it off again. I think the younger you are, the faster the tail grows back. Gohan never got his tail removed, it was always cut off in a fight...

[CaMeRoN]

Goku never got his tail sugecaly removed, or else it wouldnt have been possible for it to grow back (threw that pincer thingy) in GT, Kami just cut it off again. I think the younger you are, the faster the tail grows back. Gohan never got his tail removed, it was always cut off in a fight...

We all know that GT was incredibly innacurate with the rest of the storyline. You can't compare what happens in GT with what happens in DragonBall and DragonBall Z. The story of GT was not influenced by the creator of the original two series. Therefor what happens in GT stays in GT.

[Suhio]

We all know that GT was incredibly innacurate with the rest of the storyline. You can't compare what happens in GT with what happens in DragonBall and DragonBall Z. The story of GT was not influenced by the creator of the original two series. Therefor what happens in GT stays in GT.

I didnt know that o_O /...
But anyways, that still doesnt prove your point. Goku never said he had his tail surgecaly removed. [Are you sure about the GT thing though?]

[CaMeRoN]

I didnt know that o_O /...
But anyways, that still doesnt prove your point. Goku never said he had his tail surgecaly removed. [Are you sure about the GT thing though?]

Yeah, I suppose it doesn't prove my point. I'll try and re-watch the series and get back to you. I'm fairly certain that it was said. I'm positive about the GT thing though. Akira Toriyama had little to nothing to do with the storyline of GT. He drew the characters but that was about it.

[soviet prince]

I think Gohan having a tail when he was younger, and Trunks not having one at all, had to do with something about what genetic structure was more dominant in their DNA. Then again, that's just an uneducated assumption on why Trunks was tail-less and Gohan wasn't.
Also, don't forget that Goten didn't have a tail either.

maybe he did was just parmently removed at birth.