Better than Naruto?

[Kakkarot]

Im interested in seeing if people here are confident that this game is better than Naruto so here it is: "Is this game better than Naruto?"

[Ninja Pebble]

Im interested in seeing if people here are confident that this game is better than Naruto so here it is: "Is this game better than Naruto?"
I think its to early really to judge that. Maybe in 2 sets will know, but not when the 1st set isen't even out yet.

[hinataslover]

I think its to early really to judge that. Maybe in 2 sets will know, but not when the 1st set isen't even out yet.

agreed.you need too see what cards and other stuff tey have


your signature is hella funny

[soviet prince]

From what I seen this game is more balanced and have better mech then Naruto does.

- charging from deck and dead warriors going to chi making it easier to generate more chi.
- keywords
- events stay on field
- and it db :p

[Ninja Pebble]

agreed.you need too see what cards and other stuff tey have


your signature is hella funny
Lawl thx,
Anyway if I had to say from what I have seen and play tested. DB is better then Naruto. Pretty mush like "soviet prince" said.

[DNaraku]

If it weren't for Fierce being so rediculous, yes, it would be better than Naruto.

[soviet prince]

If it weren't for Fierce being so rediculous, yes, it would be better than Naruto.

Fierce may not be as bad as you think, you would just be forced to charge from hand more often then from your deck, that should help a lot.

[Zero]

Fierce may not be as bad as you think, you would just be forced to charge from hand more often then from your deck, that should help a lot.

No, seriously, 90% of games involving Aliums(Aliens) go to deck out. around 40% of games NOT involving Aliens go to deck out.

DNaraku and I charge from our hand when needed, but the fact remains, that via toughness, Standstill type of effects like Piccolo SR, and mirror matches with infinte negates (aliens -_-) the game becomes more of "Let me stall them until they deck out" than anything.


DB as a game is much more concrete than Naruto. My problem, is that they gave 1 element EVERYTHING, and gave another element barely anything (Not even a big character).

[cooler]

I think its to early really to judge that. Maybe in 2 sets will know, but not when the 1st set isen't even out yet.
yea i think so to i still really like naruto but i think dbz will do really well but for bow they both are equal

[CardcaptorDustin]

Im interested in seeing if people here are confident that this game is better than Naruto so here it is: "Is this game better than Naruto?"

I dont know if it will or not. I figured people would be exited that its back with a whole new format. But yet again people werent that excited about re-Z

[Pete]

Since I haven't played a game of this yet, I can't say its better then Naruto, but I can say it has a much larger chance of sticking it out in the long run as long as the players are dedicated due to the fact that it's not going saga ordered like the old dbz and new z.

[Broly's_Legendary_SS4_Son]

No, seriously, 90% of games involving Aliums(Aliens) go to deck out. around 40% of games NOT involving Aliens go to deck out.

DNaraku and I charge from our hand when needed, but the fact remains, that via toughness, Standstill type of effects like Piccolo SR, and mirror matches with infinte negates (aliens -_-) the game becomes more of "Let me stall them until they deck out" than anything.


DB as a game is much more concrete than Naruto. My problem, is that they gave 1 element EVERYTHING, and gave another element barely anything (Not even a big character).I agree with Zero. I think that we'll see the SR Piccolo in many Namekian/X decks do to his effect of stall. I pretty much have my idea for a deck when this game comes out.

[Ignatious]

Every deck NEEDS Journey of Adventure. Even with feirce 2, that 1 extra deck size per turn, haves the effectiveness of feirce 2, and negates feirce 1.