View Full Version : Poll on Four witches tech
swordmaster
01-01-2009, 08:45 PM
Just a question who here thinks four witches as is, is or is not in need of changes? taking into account the next set and what we know of it now.
)V(ajin
01-01-2009, 08:51 PM
restrict to one would be nice
Bibbo
01-01-2009, 09:15 PM
I think a poll choice should be cost change I think its fine but it should only come out later in the game (Turn 4 or 3) and with one more generic chi cost.
Makeshift Ghost
01-01-2009, 09:24 PM
I think just original printed value on the warrior should be used, have a max of 12 if using a 4 support like gohan or the new piccolo, 19 for 3 support, 6 for 2 support. that will make the card more balanced.
andysouthern
01-01-2009, 09:37 PM
I personally don't like this card, I'd never waste all that chi and hand size just to use 2 of 4 witches I think there are other options available well other than that I'm not really into playing pumps cuz my strategy is different with my villian deck
swordmaster
01-01-2009, 11:23 PM
I think a poll choice should be cost change I think its fine but it should only come out later in the game (Turn 4 or 3) and with one more generic chi cost.
That cost change would be an errata. The Cap is just an example, any major change to the card itself is errata. (ie; making it turn 4 or making it cost more chi ect.) While any change to how the card functions only would be just a ruling (ie; a minor change) just for clarification on the poll.
BalanceBJJ
01-01-2009, 11:46 PM
I personally don't like this card, I'd never waste all that chi and hand size just to use 2 of 4 witches I think there are other options available well other than that I'm not really into playing pumps cuz my strategy is different with my villian deck
so you never spend 4 chi (two of which is replaced)and 2 cards for an almost guaranteed OV? Frankly that seems like a small cost.
andysouthern
01-02-2009, 09:36 AM
but I just don't like playing two cards in my hand in order to do the huge support value thing, but that may change soon, oh wait I just looked at the chi cost, oh wow!!! geesh I'm not bright sometimes oh gosh yeah I need to change my opinion on the poll oh well too late
Piccolo'sDad
01-02-2009, 01:48 PM
so you never spend 4 chi (two of which is replaced)and 2 cards for an almost guaranteed OV? Frankly that seems like a small cost.
3 Chi technically. You can let the first one resolve before using the 2nd, so the first will go to Chi and you can use it to pay for the next one that way.
Raikiribokken
01-02-2009, 05:49 PM
wow, I didnt know this card was so broken, I guess Ill put 3 copies instead of two now!!!
LordxMugen
01-02-2009, 06:08 PM
i personally think its fine the way it is. there are still cards that hurt the value of this card and some that flat out negate it. use your imaginations to find out what that is. the only problem with this card is it can be an absolute headache to do all tha math to see if you OV or not (especially if your in a big technique match). so no, its not broken, just very good for its rarity. maybe they shouldve had copied skill trade places with it.
Goggles123
01-02-2009, 08:12 PM
I agree. Something should be done about this card. It is a bit OP. I know a 50 card deck would lower the amount of abuse this would get by a bit though.
CaMeRoN
01-03-2009, 09:26 AM
It's not a problem.. Stop hating on villains >_<
DBZFan
01-03-2009, 08:11 PM
I think it is fine. I mean, it's a one time deal as far as OV is concerned, and it was a response to evil cannon. I think yes it's good, but so is capured and other cards like that. And there are planty of ways to prevent the combo from happening
scubadude
01-03-2009, 09:35 PM
If they go to original support it will be fine .
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.