PDA

View Full Version : Regarding Dragonball and AF.


missingo
03-19-2008, 02:00 PM
Most fans of Dragonball, Z, and/or GT know that Toriyama started to make a fourth part to the Dragonball series, but it was never finished. Probably for the best. Some of the fan pictures, and some of the pictures he drew are very cool. I would find it awesome if Bandai could add some of these as sort of a sub set. I would like people's oppinions on this. Yes, I relize there is no liscense so this would be very hard to do, but it is merely an idea.

Dragonball. If this game is similiar to Naruto the Dragonball characters are going to be most of the low drops, but with conflicting names with Krillin, Yamcha, and most importantly Goku, will they put Kid before the names? I hope this is resolved and you aren't to decide hmmm... T0 Goku or T6 Goku. Also what to do about the Super Saiyans, will those be seperate characters so you would be able to have Goku and SSJ Goku and SSJ2 Goku in the same deck, or will it be similiar to growth which would probably make them un playable? Also how will they deal with most of the attacks? Most of them are character's signature moves, and also alot of characters learn them at certain ages so that would make cards quite long...

Lots of questions need answered, and relatively soon. Quite frankly I'll probably quit Naruto for DBZ because Naruto is basically wrecked.

CaMeRoN
03-19-2008, 02:05 PM
It's a really cool idea but I don't see it happening. AF is really out there :P Not really sure how they would go about doing it.

missingo
03-19-2008, 02:28 PM
Yes, there is probably no chance for AF to be in the game, but I truly think that would be awesome.

CaMeRoN
03-19-2008, 02:31 PM
Yes, there is probably no chance for AF to be in the game, but I truly think that would be awesome.

It defiantely would be cool :) Super Saiyan Pan FTW! :eek:

Chronomaster
03-19-2008, 02:33 PM
You do realize AF stands for 'April Fools', right?

In fact, this question was answered three weeks ago.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080226205716AAVc9qe

CaMeRoN
03-19-2008, 02:40 PM
You do realize AF stands for 'April Fools', right?

In fact, this question was answered three weeks ago.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080226205716AAVc9qe

That's cruel :( Poor missingo, I feel for you man.

missingo
03-19-2008, 02:44 PM
You do realize AF stands for 'April Fools', right?

In fact, this question was answered three weeks ago.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080226205716AAVc9qe
You read that way wrong, the guy was speculating that it meant April Fools.

It infact does mean Alternate Future. Toriyama DID start to draw, there are pictures that were posted that he drew. He and his company decided not to do it, probably for the better.

AF was started by Akira, but wasn't completed.

CaMeRoN
03-19-2008, 02:48 PM
You read that way wrong, the guy was speculating that it meant April Fools.

It infact does mean Alternate Future. Toriyama DID start to draw, there are pictures that were posted that he drew. He and his company decided not to do it, probably for the better.

AF was started by Akira, but wasn't completed.

Your right. There is a wikipedia page about it. Sorry if posting outside links isn't allowed but here is the wikipedia page; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragonball_af

Goldenwill
03-19-2008, 02:49 PM
Also Keep in mind that Akira Toriyama had very little involvement in GT compared to what he had in previous 2x series.

BILL

missingo
03-19-2008, 02:50 PM
Your right. There is a wikipedia page about it. Sorry if posting outside links isn't allowed but here is the wikipedia page; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragonball_af
I believe URLs are allowed, but only for information purposes, and only G rated sites. :)

Chronomaster
03-19-2008, 02:50 PM
You might want to read the talk pages there too, since the discussion there is insightful as to why AF is a AAA hoax.

Basically, the lacking amount of official announcements makes it a hoax. If Akira even thought about working on it, you'd hear about it on every news source known to man.

CaMeRoN
03-19-2008, 02:51 PM
Also Keep in mind that Akira Toriyama had very little involvement in GT compared to what he had in previous 2x series.

BILL

True man. GT was kind of a wash-out compared to the previous two.

missingo
03-19-2008, 03:20 PM
You might want to read the talk pages there too, since the discussion there is insightful as to why AF is a AAA hoax.

Basically, the stark amount of official announcements makes it a hoax. If Akira even thought about working on it, you'd hear about it on every news source known to man.
Some of it is false, in fact most of it is false.
Though, Akira did come up with new characters for a new "saga". I don't know if he came up with AF or if that was thought of by the fans, but I do know he did start to work on it but gave up.
True man. GT was kind of a wash-out compared to the previous two.
GT was sad, I kind of enjoyed Super 17, but still...

CaMeRoN
03-19-2008, 03:29 PM
GT was sad, I kind of enjoyed Super 17, but still...

Super 17 is actually my favorite Dragonball character of all time :P

Majin_vegeta
04-21-2008, 02:56 AM
Most fans of Dragonball, Z, and/or GT know that Toriyama started to make a fourth part to the Dragonball series, but it was never finished. Probably for the best. Some of the fan pictures, and some of the pictures he drew are very cool. I would find it awesome if Bandai could add some of these as sort of a sub set. I would like people's oppinions on this. Yes, I relize there is no liscense so this would be very hard to do, but it is merely an idea.

Dragonball. If this game is similiar to Naruto the Dragonball characters are going to be most of the low drops, but with conflicting names with Krillin, Yamcha, and most importantly Goku, will they put Kid before the names? I hope this is resolved and you aren't to decide hmmm... T0 Goku or T6 Goku. Also what to do about the Super Saiyans, will those be seperate characters so you would be able to have Goku and SSJ Goku and SSJ2 Goku in the same deck, or will it be similiar to growth which would probably make them un playable? Also how will they deal with most of the attacks? Most of them are character's signature moves, and also alot of characters learn them at certain ages so that would make cards quite long...

Lots of questions need answered, and relatively soon. Quite frankly I'll probably quit Naruto for DBZ because Naruto is basically wrecked.

AF Isn't coming out in America, if it does come out at all =( I wish it would, as I love dbz more than life itself haha

Dao
04-21-2008, 04:11 AM
Most fans of Dragonball, Z, and/or GT know that Toriyama started to make a fourth part to the Dragonball series, but it was never finished.

By most you must mean some, 'cause I would hope that most DBZ fans know AF to be a total crock. The artwork is fanart, the series was never worked on and I would loath to see it in this game.

soviet prince
04-21-2008, 06:59 AM
AF was fan made anime from what I gather, but it would be intresting to maybe include some in the game as subsets or promo's.

CaMeRoN
04-21-2008, 01:32 PM
AF was fan made anime from what I gather, but it would be intresting to maybe include some in the game as subsets or promo's.

Sure was! It would be neat but I don't think it would really be supported well with the other three series.

StrangeSpider
05-15-2008, 10:36 PM
You might want to read the talk pages there too, since the discussion there is insightful as to why AF is a AAA hoax.

Basically, the lacking amount of official announcements makes it a hoax. If Akira even thought about working on it, you'd hear about it on every news source known to man.

dont u think that is a bit crazy? every news source known to man? so health magazines would talk about it? technology magazines? CNN would talk about the potential for a fourth dragonball series? i highly doubt that. it would be talked about for sure, but by no major news outlets at all.

i thought it was amazing how in-depth the wikipedia article was. i dont know if i believe in db af or not but it is funny because when iwas younger and really into db and i heard about this just with a different namely i just mainly remember the siper sayian 5 thing but i blew it off as fake then so...

soviet prince
05-15-2008, 10:38 PM
any idea why this went from the tv forum to the general discussion section

StrangeSpider
05-15-2008, 10:54 PM
cuz they is trying to mess with our minds!?!?!?! . . . and our fillings!!! (the fillings in our teeth)

Chronomaster
05-16-2008, 01:06 AM
dont u think that is a bit crazy? every news source known to man? so health magazines would talk about it? technology magazines? CNN would talk about the potential for a fourth dragonball series? i highly doubt that. it would be talked about for sure, but by no major news outlets at all.

Yes, and I would drop my subscription to the Smithsonian if they failed to meet my outrageous expectations.

Teysa4Life
05-16-2008, 09:09 AM
CNN would report it. they have news on Xbox 360... really i dont see how CNN would talk about dragon ball.

cant you see dragonball is a religion to some? ignorance....

also AF is pure fake... just give up on it. its not real never was never will...

Jyoushiro
05-19-2008, 08:16 AM
XD XD XD XD
People are STILL talking about Dragonball AF!?

Evil Jim
05-19-2008, 07:25 PM
Since this does not have to do with the card game, would it do better in the new "Other Media" Forum?

losr18
05-21-2008, 09:46 PM
Dragon Ball AF was what some silly fanboys made up. Never thought of by Toriyama. It will never happen, and for the better. All I need is the main Dragon Ball story Toriyama made.

cooler
06-22-2008, 11:06 AM
It defiantely would be cool :) Super Saiyan Pan FTW! :eek:

yes that would be something else lol who know they might but i dont see it happening to be honest because that ss5 goku would be a turn 9 or higher and have a god like effect ok like the demo cards that score did of goku lv 7 and 8 esspically 8 that had writen on the card game over goku wins i mean that was f***ing crazy sure it never got to see play but the cards were still printed i mean think about how strong they would have to be

StrangeSpider
06-22-2008, 02:11 PM
Yes, and I would drop my subscription to the Smithsonian if they failed to meet my outrageous expectations.

well then you sir are a.... typical american! congrats!!!


CNN would report it. they have news on Xbox 360... really i dont see how CNN would talk about dragon ball.

cant you see dragonball is a religion to some? ignorance....

also AF is pure fake... just give up on it. its not real never was never will...

well for one when the supposed idea for AF arouse DB wasnt even that big stateside anymore. japanese shows or games never make american news. american news features xbox 360 because it is related to microsoft which is owned by bill gates who secretly rules the world...
but for real video game systems and the bad news related to them make news cuz they will be greatly talked about and politicians love to hate on video games. plus video games make money. sure cartoons can make money but im sure the xbox 360 has made more profit than DB. plus the only tv news that makes it to the news are shows that are voted on in take place in "reality". all tv shows i watch take place in the fifth dimension, that means they arent reality.

also of course i know DB is like a religion to some, but so are cults! i managed to escape the DB cult before the fbi busted it. i was way into db when it was big, i bought tons of magazines and read so much about the show that i knew how db gt ended before db was halfway thru over here, and i never even watched any episodes just the english ones on cartoon network.

HeroItachi
06-22-2008, 03:16 PM
I don't care much at all for the AF discussion, so I'm just going to address THIS portion of the TC's topic:

Dragonball. If this game is similiar to Naruto the Dragonball characters are going to be most of the low drops, but with conflicting names with Krillin, Yamcha, and most importantly Goku, will they put Kid before the names? I hope this is resolved and you aren't to decide hmmm... T0 Goku or T6 Goku. Also what to do about the Super Saiyans, will those be seperate characters so you would be able to have Goku and SSJ Goku and SSJ2 Goku in the same deck, or will it be similiar to growth which would probably make them un playable? Also how will they deal with most of the attacks? Most of them are character's signature moves, and also alot of characters learn them at certain ages so that would make cards quite long...

I don't think that they will differentiate between the older and younger versions of the characters. After all, it wouldn't be the first time Bandai had the same character occupy different turn slots. Take Gaara for example. Most Gaaras occupy the T2 or T4 slot, but there is also a T0 Gaara that is Gaara as a small child but still has the same name as the rest. I'm guessing this is because while this is at a different point in time in the character's life, Different time =/= different form, thus why the characters are not given different names.

Speaking of forms, the SSJ forms have already been confirmed to have "Super Saiyan" in their names and therefore be considered different Warriors in terms of Deck construction. Naruto has something similar to this in the form of Gaara and Gaara (Possessed Mode). Since it's legal to have 3 of both of those in 1 Naruto CCG Deck, it's not too much of a stretch to say tt will be legal to have 3 Goku's and 3 Goku (Super Saiyan)'s in 1 DB CCG Deck.

As for "signature moves" and the ages that the character learn them at, I think that's part of what the Turn cost on the Techniques are for. Not only do the Turn costs provide balance to the Techniques, but they make sure that a massive Technique isn't played until way later in the game, acting as a "timeline" in and of itself.

Take Death Ball, for example. Even though some players are already figuring out ways to get Frieza FF out early, they still can't use Death Ball until the proper turn, thereby preventing severe abuse of the Trigrams-like Technique early to mid-game.