Ruling Question

[Broly]

Okat so heres the deal.
Lets say i have Ariod 17 out and my opponent has Cell with a dragonball coin on him out.
He sends out Cell.
I defend with 17.
My opponent then use Mercelless Attack on my 17.
How much Chi would he have to pay to target my 17?

[Piccolo'sDad]

Okat so heres the deal.
Lets say i have Ariod 17 out and my opponent has Cell with a dragonball coin on him out.
He sends out Cell.
I defend with 17.
My opponent then use Mercelless Attack on my 17.
How much Chi would he have to pay to target my 17?

11, at least one of which has to be a Villain Chi.

Breakdown:

Merciless Attack has to be used by a Villain Warrior. Cell is using it. So requirements are met.

The cost is (V)XX

So 1 Villain Chi, and then X and X

X equals the Turn Cost of the Warrior, with a minimum of 1, because of the X cannot equal 0 rule.

And since it has two X's, they both have to be paid fully.

So the cost is then (V)(5)(5).

Which equals out to 11 Chi total. 1 Villain and 10 anything.

[Broly]

11, at least one of which has to be a Villain Chi.

Breakdown:

Merciless Attack has to be used by a Villain Warrior. Cell is using it. So requirements are met.

The cost is (V)XX

So 1 Villain Chi, and then X and X

X equals the Turn Cost of the Warrior, with a minimum of 1, because of the X cannot equal 0 rule.

And since it has two X's, they both have to be paid fully.

So the cost is then (V)(5)(5).

Which equals out to 11 Chi total. 1 Villain and 10 anything.

Thats what i was saying but I was playing my Mejin today in the Mejin challenge and he was saying you split the cost so it would only cost 7 chi.
Like since hes a turn five you round it up one to 6 then add one villian chi so it would be 7.

[Piccolo'sDad]

Thats what i was saying but I was playing my Mejin today in the Mejin challenge and he was saying you split the cost so it would only cost 7 chi.
Like since hes a turn five you round it up one to 6 then add one villian chi so it would be 7.

No, your Meijin is very incorrect, and you should slap him on the wrist for not knowing the proper ruling.

When there are more than one X's in the cost of something, you must determine X, and then pay each X to it's full amount.

This happened the first time we got a double X jutsu in Naruto, it was some water jutsu that costed 1 Water and X X. And it milled X cards off the top of the opponent's deck. We had to go over it really quick to realize that you only get to mill X, but have to pay X twice.

[Ninja Pebble]

I know i know but how do you argue with your mejin?
I tried saying that and used Naruto as an example but he just said they are both two totally different games. >_<
Look for that ruling on this site then print it out and show him, if he says anything is wrong. Then hes just cheating for his own uses.

`

[Broly]

No, your Meijin is very incorrect, and you should slap him on the wrist for not knowing the proper ruling.

When there are more than one X's in the cost of something, you must determine X, and then pay each X to it's full amount.

This happened the first time we got a double X jutsu in Naruto, it was some water jutsu that costed 1 Water and X X. And it milled X cards off the top of the opponent's deck. We had to go over it really quick to realize that you only get to mill X, but have to pay X twice.

I know i know but how do you argue with your mejin?
I tried saying that and used Naruto as an example but he just said they are both two totally different games. >_<

[Gohan999]

thats because they are 2 different games lol.:D

[Broly]

Look for that ruling on this site then print it out and show him, if he says anything is wrong. Then hes just cheating for his own uses.

`

How am i suppost to find a ruing when the dang moderator for the Q&A forums is never on. >_>

[CaMeRoN]

You can use these as a reference Broly..

Ruling for paying the chi cost of when X = 0 (http://cyberrealmsgaming.com/index.php?showtopic=3840)

Look under Merciless Attack (http://cyberrealmsgaming.com/index.php?showtopic=3433)

[suprsaiyanprince]

is your meijin brian?

[Broly]

is your meijin brian?
Yah who is this?
You can use these as a reference Broly..

Ruling for paying the chi cost of when X = 0 (http://cyberrealmsgaming.com/index.php?showtopic=3840)

Look under Merciless Attack (http://cyberrealmsgaming.com/index.php?showtopic=3433)


Dude those arent official rulings!
They are just links on your site. >_>

[CaMeRoN]

They are pulled from official rulings and there are sources listed.

[Broly]

They are pulled from official rulings and there are sources listed.

Whatever i guess its worth a sht. =/

[CaMeRoN]

Whatever i guess its worth a shot. =/

I'm glad you think so :p

[suprsaiyanprince]

[QUOTE=Broly;19105]Yah who is this?



this is john. Brian is wrong.